| Tennessee Board of Regents: Developmental Studies Redesign Initiative 
 Chattanooga State Technical Community College  Course Title: Basic Math, Elementary Algebra and Intermediate Algebra Redesign Coordinator: John Squires
 Status: This project was originally part of the Tennessee Board of Regents  Developmental Studies Redesign Initiative, 2006 – 2009, and was not completed  successfully. Subsequently, the college launched a second redesign, described  below, which increased student success at reduced cost. Project Abstract Chattanooga State Technical Community College redesigned three  developmental math courses: Basic Mathematics, Elementary Algebra, and  Intermediate Algebra. These three courses serve ~3600 students during the fall  and spring terms. The majority of the students were previously taught in a  traditional lecture format with one instructor teaching up to 28 students in a  class often supplemented with computer-based homework. Students also had the  option of working in a lab setting using MyMathLab to complete all  homework.  The traditional courses experienced a number of academic problems. Low  student success rates (excluding withdrawals) ranged from 51% to 64%, making it  necessary for students to either repeat the entire course or drop out of  college. Students had to progress at the same rate with little attention to  individual learning styles. They were allowed to retake tests, but they were  also required to learn new material before the prerequisite skills had been  mastered. Students may have passed the course, but there was no guarantee that  they actually mastered all of the concepts needed to succeed in subsequent  courses. Additionally, the percent of non-developmental mathematics students  passing their first college-level math course was ~6% higher than the students  who completed the developmental math sequence. Their GPA was also ~.34 points  higher than the developmental math students in the same courses. The college's redesign plan modularized the course and used the Emporium  Model. Instructors met their students in a computer classroom one hour each  week, followed by a second class meeting in the math lab.  Students were expected to spend an additional  hour in the math lab outside of class time. The computer lab was open ~65 hours  per week, staffed by faculty, professional tutors, and student tutors. Class  size was reduced to a maximum of 24 students, and the number of sections was  increased to expand the capacity of the developmental math program. Students received individual assistance in  both the classroom and the math lab, helping them to learn the material and  succeed in the course. Additionally, the  college’s developmental math program was streamlined to comprise two courses  instead of three. This streamlining allowed  students to exit developmental math and enter college math faster than in the  traditional sequence, where the majority of students remained for more than a  year.  Students are now able to exit  developmental math in one or two semesters.  Quality has been enhanced by standardizing content and assessment  across all sections. The module approach supports various learning styles and  eliminates the conflict of mastering multiple topics simultaneously. Students  in this active learning environment are now able to progress at their own rate,  receiving immediate feedback from the software and one-on-one assistance in the  lab. Students who fail a module are able to pick up where they left off and not  have to repeat the entire course. Students may also take challenge tests for  module placement.   During AY  2007–2008 prior to the redesign, the overall student success rate (grade of C  or better) was 45.4% (48.7% in fall 2007 and 40.9% in spring 2008.)  Of the 3,538 students in the developmental  math program, only 23% exited.  During AY  2010–2011 after the redesign, the overall success rate in the redesigned  program increased to 56.1% (57.2% in fall 2010 and 54.8% in spring 2011.) Of the 4,388 students enrolled in the  program, 33% exited the program. Additionally,  140 of the students who exited the program started in the first developmental  math course and completed both courses in one semester. These students exited developmental math one  or two semesters earlier than they would have in the traditional system. The average GPA in the program also improved,  going from a 1.69 GPA in fall 2007 and a 1.49 GPA in spring 2008 to a 2.05 GPA  in fall 2010 and a 2.03 GPA in spring 2011.  Finally, withdrawal rates dropped dramatically, going from over 13% in  AY 2007-2008 to less than 5% in AY 2010-2011.   Cost savings were achieved by increasing the number of sections taught  by each faculty member. In the  traditional approach, a faculty member taught two sections of 22 students three  hours each week. In the redesign, the  same faculty member taught three sections of 24 students two hours each  week. This allowed the department to  increase the number of sections offered while reducing the number of adjuncts  teaching the course. CSTCC's  cost-per-student was reduced from $191 in the traditional format to $145 in the  redesign, a cost savings of 24%. The  annual savings will be used to further expand the math redesign and enhance the  math facilities at Chattanooga State. Since the number of students exiting developmental math has increased,  the department has experienced a dramatic increase in enrollment in  college-level math courses, which has necessitated the expansion of the math  lab.      |